Worst tap water in the Netherlands?

Reading time: ~12 minutes

Quick answer

There is no region in the Netherlands with unsafe tap water. According to the RIVM (Dutch National Institute for Public Health and the Environment), Dutch tap water is so clean that you can drink it without worry. There are, however, measurable regional differences. The highest PFAS concentrations are found in the western Netherlands, where drinking water is made from river water: there, more than half of measurements exceed the health-based guideline value of 4.4 nanograms per litre, compared with one in ten for groundwater.

Find out for yourself what comes out of your tap

The PureFilter Mineral+ filters out more than 100 contaminants and adds back calcium, magnesium and potassium.

View PureFilter Mineral+

What does bad tap water actually mean?

Anyone searching for the worst tap water in the Netherlands is actually looking for two different things: is my water unsafe, and is my water worse than someone else's? The answer to the first question is no. The answer to the second is: in some respects, yes, and those respects can be measured.

Definition

Drinking water quality in the Netherlands is not a matter of opinion but a statutory test. The RIVM states that statutory quality requirements apply to around 80 chemical substances and substance groups and micro-organisms, plus indicators for odour, taste and physical parameters. Water that meets those requirements is by definition safe drinking water. Bad therefore does not exist as an official category: there is water that complies, and water that may not be supplied.

At PureFilter, we find that customers rarely call because they think their water is unsafe. They call because they have a limescale ring on their tap, because they read something about PFAS in the newspaper, or because the water at their parents' house tastes different from their own. Those are exactly the three points where the Netherlands does differ: hardness, source, and the substances that make purification work hardest.

Where in the Netherlands is water quality worst?

This is almost always where things go wrong, and the confusion is understandable. The Netherlands genuinely ranks at the bottom in Europe on water quality. But that ranking concerns surface water: ditches, streams, rivers and lakes. NPO Radio 1 reported, based on RIVM research, that the Netherlands is one of the worst EU member states on water quality, partly due to pollution from chemical substances, medicine residues and pesticides.

That is not the same as your tap. Between the ditch and your glass sit ten drinking water companies with purification that, according to the Drinkwaterplatform (Dutch drinking water industry platform), must meet hundreds of requirements, far more than bottled water. Poor source water in the Netherlands therefore does not produce poor tap water. It produces more expensive and more complicated purification, and that is the real problem the sector is warning about.

In short: the quality of Dutch surface water is among the worst in Europe. The quality of Dutch tap water, according to the RIVM, is among the best in the world. Both statements are true, and they refer to different water.

The real difference: the source of your drinking water

If there is one factor that explains the regional differences, it is the source. According to the RIVM, sixty percent of Dutch drinking water comes from groundwater. In the west of the country, groundwater is too salty, so surface water from the Rhine, the Meuse and the IJsselmeer is used there instead, partly pre-purified through infiltration in the dunes.

Groundwater is rainwater that has sometimes taken centuries to reach its place, filtered through layers of clay and sand and without oxygen, so without bacteria and viruses. River water is young, exposed to everything discharged further upstream, and therefore needs much more intensive purification. If you want to know where your water comes from, that is shown on the map Bron van het drinkwater (Source of drinking water) from Atlas Leefomgeving.

That distinction between source and technique is exactly why it pays to know which filter type suits the water in your region. A filter that tackles limescale does not solve a PFAS problem, and vice versa.

PFAS: where the biggest regional difference lies

PFAS is where the regional difference can be most sharply substantiated, and the figures come from the RIVM itself. By law, twenty different PFAS combined may total 100 nanograms per litre in drinking water, and the RIVM confirms that Dutch drinking water complies. Based on new knowledge about effects on the immune system, the RIVM now recommends a much stricter guideline value: 4.4 nanograms per litre, expressed in PFOA equivalents.

Measured against that stricter standard, a pattern does emerge. The RIVM report PFAS in Nederlands drinkwater (PFAS in Dutch drinking water) states that in more than half of measurements in drinking water made from river water, the concentration exceeds the WHO reference point, versus one in ten measurements in drinking water from groundwater. The highest concentrations are found in the western Netherlands, where drinking water is mainly made from river water.

Two things are worth noting straight away. First, the amount of PFAS from drinking water alone stays on average below the health-based limit; through food, the Dutch take in roughly three times as much, according to the RIVM. Second, the level is not falling quickly, since PFAS barely break down. Anyone who wants to see where PFAS has been measured in the Netherlands can find the measured locations listed there, and the overview of everywhere PFAS turns up explains why the route via food is usually bigger than the one via your tap.

If you live in the west and want to bring that route down to zero, the question is which technique can do that. We explain this on our page about the water filter against PFAS.

Nitrate on sandy and loess soils

The second regional dividing line runs not between east and west but between sand and clay. According to Vewin (Dutch association of drinking water companies), it is mainly the leaching water from farms on sandy and loess soils that contains too much nitrate. Groundwater with more than 50 milligrams of nitrate per litre is less suitable for making drinking water, and in about 20 percent of groundwater abstractions, nitrate, nickel and sulphate are already, or may in future become, a problem substance.

There are even 34 designated vulnerable groundwater protection areas where the nitrate concentration in shallow groundwater must fall permanently below that standard. Again, this concerns the source, not your tap: the tap water coming from those areas meets the standard because the company purifies it further or blends sources. What it means is that purification there costs more effort. How nitrate works, and why infants in particular are mentioned, is covered in our article on filtering nitrate from tap water.

Hardness: the difference you notice

Hardness is the only difference you can see without a laboratory, and it is the difference most people mean by bad water. Evides (Dutch drinking water company) explains that hardness is expressed in German degrees of hardness and can vary considerably by production company depending on soil composition, groundwater flow and agriculture. The dunes are naturally rich in lime, so water there is harder; water from the Meuse is softer, partly because it is already softened in the storage reservoirs.

Hard water is not unhealthy. It leaves limescale on your tap, in your kettle and in your coffee machine, and it makes tea and coffee taste flatter. If you want the value for your own town, it is listed per municipality in our overview of water hardness per municipality. For the background on how hard Dutch water actually is, we have covered hard water in the Netherlands separately.

Chlorine: why Dutch tap water tastes different

This is the point where the Netherlands actually differs favourably on an international level. Because bacteria and viruses are already made harmless during purification using UV light or ozone, and because the pipe network barely leaks, adding chlorine is not necessary. According to the Drinkwaterplatform, only PWN (Dutch drinking water company) and Evides add a minimal amount of chlorine dioxide as a precaution, in a dose that is not measurable at the tap.

If your water smells of chlorine on holiday in Spain or France, that is not imagination but policy. And it is not just a matter of taste: at high concentrations, chlorine can undergo reactions that produce harmful by-products. What chlorine does in water, and why a filter changes that, is covered in filtering chlorine from tap water.

Ranking: how the regions compare

There is no official ranking from best to worst tap water, nor can there be one: all ten drinking water companies supply water that meets the same statutory requirements. What can be done is to place the regions side by side on the three points that differ per area. That produces this picture.

Region Most-used source PFAS pressure on the source Nitrate pressure on the source Hardness
Western Netherlands (Noord- and Zuid-Holland, Utrecht) River water and dune infiltration Highest in the Netherlands, according to the RIVM Low Often harder due to lime-rich dunes
Southwest (Zeeland, Zuid-Holland islands) Meuse water via storage reservoirs Elevated, because river water Low to average Softer in most places
South (Noord-Brabant, Limburg) Groundwater Lower, because groundwater Highest: sandy and loess soils Varies by production location
East and Central (Gelderland, Overijssel, Flevoland) Groundwater Lower, because groundwater Elevated on the sandy soils Varies, often average
North (Friesland, Groningen, Drenthe) Groundwater Lower, because groundwater Elevated on the sandy soils Varies by area

The conclusion from that table is not that there is a loser. It is that the question is being framed wrongly. The western Netherlands has the biggest PFAS challenge and the south the biggest nitrate challenge, while on hardness the dividing line runs differently again. Anyone living in the west therefore has a different reason to filter than someone living in Brabant, which explains why the best water filter for one person is something different than for another.

What you can do yourself if you want certainty

A filter is not a necessity in the Netherlands. The RIVM and the Voedingscentrum (Dutch Nutrition Centre) simply advise continuing to drink tap water, and we endorse that advice. What a filter does do is take responsibility for the last few metres: the part of the route your drinking water company no longer controls, such as the pipes inside your own home, and the substances putting pressure on the source that you would rather not have in your glass at all.

The PureFilter Mineral+ is an under-sink filter with five filtration stages that removes more than 100 contaminants, including PFAS, microplastics, heavy metals such as lead and copper, fluoride, nitrates, medicine residues and chlorine. It is NSF-certified to 42, 53, 61 and 372. The final stage is what sets it apart: via Swedish Mineral Rock™, calcium, magnesium and potassium go back in. Purify first, then mineralise, in that order.

The filter costs €149.00 including the first filter cartridge. A replacement filter costs €65.00 and lasts around twelve months for 1 to 3 people; around six months for 4 to 6 people. The duo with two cartridges costs €115.00. Converted, that is less than one cent per litre, compared with €0.40 to €1.00 for a litre of bottled water. If you would rather not think about it, the Filterplan automatically ships cartridges on time for €48.00 or €86.00 per delivery.

You install it yourself in 5 to 10 minutes on the cold water pipe under your sink. You do not need a plumber; for the installation you use a single pair of water pump pliers, and later you replace the cartridge with the supplied key. A 3/8 connector is included as standard. If you first want to see what fits under a sink, take a look at what water filters we sell.

Pure water, with the minerals in it

More than 100 contaminants out, calcium, magnesium and potassium in. NSF 42, 53, 61 and 372.

View PureFilter Mineral+ Under-sink water filter

Comparison: PureFilter next to the alternatives

Approach What it tackles Minerals Convenience Cost per litre
Doing nothing, drinking tap water Meets the statutory standard; PFAS stays at the level of your region Stay in Maximum About €0.001
Filter jug Mainly taste and chlorine, limited effect on heavy metals Partly removed Refilling, replace filter every month Higher than a fixed filter
Reverse osmosis Broad, but with electricity, waste water and a lower pH Largely removed Large unit, more invasive installation Variable, plus water loss
Bottled water Different source, no visibility on microplastics from the bottle Depends on the brand Carrying and storing €0.40 to €1.00
PureFilter Mineral+ More than 100 contaminants, NSF 42, 53, 61 and 372 Restored via Swedish Mineral Rock™ Invisible under the sink, from your own tap Less than €0.01

When comparing, pay attention to the minerals column. A technique that removes everything also removes calcium, magnesium and potassium, which lowers the pH value of tap water. That is exactly the difference between stripping everything out and purifying selectively, and it is why we placed mineralisation as the final step for our under-sink filter.

Looking up the quality of your own tap water

You do not have to guess. In three steps, you know exactly what comes out of your tap.

  • Step 1: look up your supplier via the map from Vewin. The Netherlands has ten drinking water companies, and your postcode determines which one serves you.
  • Step 2: check the source on the map Bron van het drinkwater. Groundwater, river water or bank-filtered groundwater accounts for most of the differences.
  • Step 3: request the quality report from your own company. These publish hardness, acidity and measured substances per production location, usually updated quarterly. We show how to read such a report using Vitens (Dutch drinking water company) water quality as an example.

A test strip from a webshop measures hardness and acidity roughly, but says nothing about PFAS, medicine residues or microplastics. For those substances you depend on measurements from your water company and the RIVM, and that is exactly what we advise customers to check before buying anything.

Frequently asked questions

Where in the Netherlands is water quality worst?

For surface water, meaning ditches, streams and rivers, the Netherlands as a whole ranks among the worst in the EU. For tap water there is no worst region: all delivered drinking water meets statutory requirements. On the RIVM's stricter PFAS guideline value, the western Netherlands stands out because drinking water there is made from river water.

What is the best tap water in the Netherlands?

There is no official winner. If you want to select for the lowest PFAS pressure, areas on groundwater have the advantage: there, according to the RIVM, one in ten measurements exceeds the stricter guideline value, versus more than half for river water. If you want to select for hardness, a completely different map emerges. So which is best depends on what you're looking at.

Where is the softest drinking water in the Netherlands?

In areas where the water does not come from lime-rich layers. Evides reports that the dunes are naturally rich in lime, making water there harder, while drinking water from Meuse water is softer in most places, partly because it is already softened in the storage reservoirs. The value for your own town is listed in our overview of water hardness per municipality.

Is Bar le Duc better than tap water?

Not in terms of safety. Tap water must meet hundreds of requirements according to the Drinkwaterplatform, far more than bottled water, and the RIVM ranks the quality of Dutch tap water among the best in the world. Differences lie in mineral composition and taste, and in cost: bottled water costs €0.40 to €1.00 per litre, tap water about a tenth of a cent.

Does my tap water contain PFAS?

In small amounts, probably yes, since PFAS occur everywhere and barely break down. The statutory maximum is 100 nanograms per litre for twenty PFAS combined, and Dutch drinking water meets that. The RIVM recommends a stricter guideline value of 4.4 nanograms per litre, and against that standard, more than half of measurements for river water are higher.

Do I need a water filter if my tap water is already safe?

It is not necessary. Dutch tap water meets the standard, and the RIVM simply advises drinking it. People choose a filter for the part the water company no longer controls: the pipes in their own home, and the substances putting pressure on the source. The PureFilter Mineral+ removes more than 100 contaminants and adds back calcium, magnesium and potassium.

Why does tap water taste different at my parents' house than at mine?

Because drinking water is produced locally by ten different companies, with small differences in mineral ratio and hardness. The pipes in the house and the temperature of the water also play a role. A taste difference is therefore not a quality difference: it is soil composition that you taste.

Conclusion

There is no worst tap water in the Netherlands. All ten drinking water companies supply water that meets statutory requirements, and the RIVM ranks the quality among the best in the world. The ranking where the Netherlands sits at the bottom concerns surface water, not your tap.

What does vary per region are three things. The source: sixty percent of drinking water comes from groundwater, in the west it is river water. The pressure on that source: the western Netherlands has the highest PFAS concentrations, the south on sandy and loess soils has the biggest nitrate challenge, with 34 designated vulnerable groundwater protection areas. And hardness, which you notice on your kettle.

Anyone wanting to filter on that basis should look at technique, not fear. The PureFilter Mineral+ costs €149.00 including the first filter, is NSF-certified to 42, 53, 61 and 372, removes more than 100 contaminants, and you install it in 5 to 10 minutes without a plumber, using a single pair of water pump pliers. The replacement filter costs €65.00 and lasts around twelve months for 1 to 3 people, around six months for 4 to 6 people: less than one cent per litre. With 40 days of free returns and a 5-year warranty, you can calmly check at home whether you taste the difference.

Water as it is meant to be

Filters out what does not belong, and adds back what is missing. 40 days of free returns and a 5-year warranty.

View PureFilter Mineral+ Frequently asked questions
Back to blog